It is indeed surprising that in the whole episode and in the other similar episodes, including Tejpal, media has failed. Rest others have succeeded in their respective games.
Media did not deal with the story from grass roots level.
The whole procedure, as adopted, smacks of extra legal implications.
Apex Court taking cognizance of intern's complaint, Tejpal's bail plea being heard on fast track and out of turn, Tejpal's alleged prey speaking out nothing substantial or ,if said, media failing to report the same blow by blow.
All this is indeed intreaguing which only imbeciles among your readers my readily digest. We are not that. We pat you for your failures or mediocrity, whichever be the case.

In rape related stories, it must be specified what kind of rape it is. One kind is that which shook the nation. Remember. The real one coupled with brutality coupled with murder, and what not. The other is the one which has been alleged against justice ganguli and also tejpal. In these two instances, rape is not alleged to be physical, rather notional, like terms such as constructive possession or deemed export. The house on rent is possessed by the tenant but the landlord is presumed to be in a kind of possession, known as constructive possession. Likewise, an item despatched overseas is export but under import export policy a supply from bhagalpur to bhagalpur under a world bank funded project may be a deemed export, implying something understood as export though actually not. Likewise, rape has gathered the same definitional value. Rape, constructive rape, deemed rape, etc. So be intellectually update, to tell your teaders full detail, rather than speaking out in such trickcles as in case of tehelka and retired sc judge.