How vibrant is the media?
Refer Vadra Case, as Media reports.
Vadra purchased land for a small price consideration and sold it at huge profit. He thus made crores without investing anything in substance. In the transactions are also involved government licensing. All these involve lubrications which state government is alleged to have facilitated.
Fine. 
I have some questions. May be I missed to notice the answers which media reports might have given. If that be so, please supplement. But if not, please don't decry when I decry media depravity,
First, Vadra purchased , from whom? From private party? Or from the Government? What are its other details? If the purchase price was small and the margin Vadra earned was astounding, the one who really lost was the vendor. Who that vendor is and what does the vendor say in that regard. What are the property and registration laws in practice there which involve government approval and at what stage, for what? Where does licensing by government come into play?
And above all, why so many questions should lurk, when the media is said to be so vibrant?