OMKAR II
Why at all begin a search with assumptions drawn from any belief system? Why can't we employ empirical observations to deduce own conclusion, independent of a belief system? Inputs from an ancient belief system may at the most be employed as sample, to verify its likely validity, though the idea is or should not be to discard a sample on the basis of a likely non-discovery. Such non-discovery may not imply failure on veracity test. It may as well imply failure of test standard. For instance, we put on test whether there is any sound under transmission. We concentrate. But fail to pick up any radio broadcast. Does that entitle one to discard the belief that Vividh Bharti, Desh Ki Dharkan is not in broadcast? If one has a scientific temper, a scientific inference would be preferred, that we don't have that apparatus called radio set that is required to be tuned to receive the broadcast which is otherwise unavailable to the ear drums.
So that brings us back to the point where we last parted, natural breath, to which we are trying to attend, giving our ear , better say focussing it.
The exhalation is easy to register, being louder compared to its other counterpart. Simply equate it with the closest of the sound you habitually use. When you nod affirmatively to something, implying your 'yes', without using the tongue, what sound is generated? I am not prompting you to spell it out, what I mean to state is let the sound spell itself out.
When this is done, exploration for the incoming counterpart may become easy.
Idea is to increase the volume of reception, rather than that of production.
It will indeed upset value of the search if something is suggested. It is better to find it out for yourself, welcoming that which you perceive in fact, as opposed to that which you ought to, in terms of any belief systems.
(To be concluded in a post in my blog, to which you are welcome, www.rajeshsahai.blogspot.in)
Why at all begin a search with assumptions drawn from any belief system? Why can't we employ empirical observations to deduce own conclusion, independent of a belief system? Inputs from an ancient belief system may at the most be employed as sample, to verify its likely validity, though the idea is or should not be to discard a sample on the basis of a likely non-discovery. Such non-discovery may not imply failure on veracity test. It may as well imply failure of test standard. For instance, we put on test whether there is any sound under transmission. We concentrate. But fail to pick up any radio broadcast. Does that entitle one to discard the belief that Vividh Bharti, Desh Ki Dharkan is not in broadcast? If one has a scientific temper, a scientific inference would be preferred, that we don't have that apparatus called radio set that is required to be tuned to receive the broadcast which is otherwise unavailable to the ear drums.
So that brings us back to the point where we last parted, natural breath, to which we are trying to attend, giving our ear , better say focussing it.
The exhalation is easy to register, being louder compared to its other counterpart. Simply equate it with the closest of the sound you habitually use. When you nod affirmatively to something, implying your 'yes', without using the tongue, what sound is generated? I am not prompting you to spell it out, what I mean to state is let the sound spell itself out.
When this is done, exploration for the incoming counterpart may become easy.
Idea is to increase the volume of reception, rather than that of production.
It will indeed upset value of the search if something is suggested. It is better to find it out for yourself, welcoming that which you perceive in fact, as opposed to that which you ought to, in terms of any belief systems.
(To be concluded in a post in my blog, to which you are welcome, www.rajeshsahai.blogspot.in)
No comments:
Post a Comment