Discussion with Bhaskar Editor
Apropos Bhaskar's impugned news story published on 9.6.18, a discussion ensued at length with the Editor, which the communication addressed to him and others, as depicted below, seeks to cover.
M: +917982609575, +919430023560
Rani Sahai, Peepal – The Resilience Lab,
Shiva Bhawan, Police Line Rd.
Bhagalpur
10.06.18
1.Kedar Prasad Singhal
Printer and Publisher for M/S D B Corp Ltd. Dainik Bhaskar Hindi Daily
Shed No. 8,
Shri Bhagwati Hosiery Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Marg,
Tilkamanjhi
812001
2. Om Gaud,
Editor, Dainik Bhaskar Hindi Daily,
Printer and Publisher for M/S D B Corp Ltd. Dainik Bhaskar Hindi Daily
Shed No. 8,
Shri Bhagwati Hosiery Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Marg,
Tilkamanjhi
812001
3. Rajesh Ranjan,
Karyakari Editor,
Printer and Publisher for M/S D B Corp Ltd. Dainik Bhaskar Hindi Daily
Shed No. 8,
Shri Bhagwati Hosiery Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Marg,
Tilkamanjhi
812001.
Dear Sir(s),
Ref: News story which appeared in Dainik Bhasker edition dated 9.6.18 at Page 2 captioned, ‘Peepal ke Regstration par…‘ besides other inboxed stories concerning Peepal, inter alia.
Sir,
1. This is with reference to discussion we had at length on Saturday with reference to the news story published by you which we have already impugned. Leave that aside for a moment, in that the present communication seeks to dwell only on the discussion abovesaid.
2. It is nice that you made it clear in so many words that your focus is not on any laches on Peepal's part anywhere.
3. Your entire focus is on your perception about irregularities purported to be there in the conduct of the municipal corporation towards Peepal. All you have to seek for an answer is from Municipal Corporation ,not Peepal.
4. Be that as it may, we stand nowhere between you and municipal corporation nor have anything to say whether your premise about questioning them is forbidden. Nevertheless, even though not within your target anywhere, it emerged from the discussion that you have vicariously put us in the crossfire with assumptions that are misconceived, which is obviously contrived one.
5. Your main thrust is on a 'why'.
6.The said why is illogically that why is it Peepal which is taking initiative within the system of municipal corporation in the matter of solid waste management.
7.The above 'why' has corollary which is even more poignant from your standpoint. The same is as to why other NGOs whom you think are sitting around are not given to take such initiatives.
8.Your above question tells more than sounds at the eardrums. It tells about your interest which might be covert. In case you are batting for some NGO whose entry into the system might be of some interest personally, you may not be wrong, technically of course but not morally which fact I beg to break up blow by blow herein below.
9.Assuming your covert interest to be bona fide kindly take initiative in the matter from your end, in case you may. You have a very broad reach which please utilise, seeking presentation from NGOs who have held back or who are waiting around the corner to jump into the frame by the use of your good offices. You may expect even us to take part therein. This maybe done within a time frame that would justify and reason out readiness and willingness. And of course competence too.
10.If you are pleased to adopt this course you may have a direct answer to the hypothetical question contrived by you in this matter which tends to presuppose presence of something which is absent in reality but is brewing in the devil's workshop.
11.We write this in the hope that either you realise the folly or contribute to the city a band of NGOs which might be contributing effectively and efficaciously rather than sounding aloud like drums that sound louder once beaten.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
Apropos Bhaskar's impugned news story published on 9.6.18, a discussion ensued at length with the Editor, which the communication addressed to him and others, as depicted below, seeks to cover.
M: +917982609575, +919430023560
Rani Sahai, Peepal – The Resilience Lab,
Shiva Bhawan, Police Line Rd.
Bhagalpur
10.06.18
1.Kedar Prasad Singhal
Printer and Publisher for M/S D B Corp Ltd. Dainik Bhaskar Hindi Daily
Shed No. 8,
Shri Bhagwati Hosiery Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Marg,
Tilkamanjhi
812001
2. Om Gaud,
Editor, Dainik Bhaskar Hindi Daily,
Printer and Publisher for M/S D B Corp Ltd. Dainik Bhaskar Hindi Daily
Shed No. 8,
Shri Bhagwati Hosiery Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Marg,
Tilkamanjhi
812001
3. Rajesh Ranjan,
Karyakari Editor,
Printer and Publisher for M/S D B Corp Ltd. Dainik Bhaskar Hindi Daily
Shed No. 8,
Shri Bhagwati Hosiery Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Marg,
Tilkamanjhi
812001.
Dear Sir(s),
Ref: News story which appeared in Dainik Bhasker edition dated 9.6.18 at Page 2 captioned, ‘Peepal ke Regstration par…‘ besides other inboxed stories concerning Peepal, inter alia.
Sir,
1. This is with reference to discussion we had at length on Saturday with reference to the news story published by you which we have already impugned. Leave that aside for a moment, in that the present communication seeks to dwell only on the discussion abovesaid.
2. It is nice that you made it clear in so many words that your focus is not on any laches on Peepal's part anywhere.
3. Your entire focus is on your perception about irregularities purported to be there in the conduct of the municipal corporation towards Peepal. All you have to seek for an answer is from Municipal Corporation ,not Peepal.
4. Be that as it may, we stand nowhere between you and municipal corporation nor have anything to say whether your premise about questioning them is forbidden. Nevertheless, even though not within your target anywhere, it emerged from the discussion that you have vicariously put us in the crossfire with assumptions that are misconceived, which is obviously contrived one.
5. Your main thrust is on a 'why'.
6.The said why is illogically that why is it Peepal which is taking initiative within the system of municipal corporation in the matter of solid waste management.
7.The above 'why' has corollary which is even more poignant from your standpoint. The same is as to why other NGOs whom you think are sitting around are not given to take such initiatives.
8.Your above question tells more than sounds at the eardrums. It tells about your interest which might be covert. In case you are batting for some NGO whose entry into the system might be of some interest personally, you may not be wrong, technically of course but not morally which fact I beg to break up blow by blow herein below.
9.Assuming your covert interest to be bona fide kindly take initiative in the matter from your end, in case you may. You have a very broad reach which please utilise, seeking presentation from NGOs who have held back or who are waiting around the corner to jump into the frame by the use of your good offices. You may expect even us to take part therein. This maybe done within a time frame that would justify and reason out readiness and willingness. And of course competence too.
10.If you are pleased to adopt this course you may have a direct answer to the hypothetical question contrived by you in this matter which tends to presuppose presence of something which is absent in reality but is brewing in the devil's workshop.
11.We write this in the hope that either you realise the folly or contribute to the city a band of NGOs which might be contributing effectively and efficaciously rather than sounding aloud like drums that sound louder once beaten.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
No comments:
Post a Comment